St. Croix, USVI

loader-image
St. Croix
12:11 am, Sep 6, 2025
temperature icon 86°F

‘Death or food’: The Palestinians killed by Israel at Gaza’s aid centres 

Khan Younis, Gaza – At the sight of her son Ahmed’s bullet-riddled body laid out in the courtyard of Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza, Asmahan Shaat collapsed on the ground, overcome by grief. Her screams echoed through the air, her voice choked by shock and sorrow.

She kissed the 23-year-old’s face, hands and feet as she cried. Her six other children and relatives tried to hold her back, but she pushed them away.

“Leave me with him. Leave me with him,” she cried. “Ahmed will speak again. He told me, ‘Mom, I am not going to die. I’ll bring you something from the aid centre in Rafah.’”

Ahmed had left the displaced family’s shelter in al-Mawasi before dawn on Thursday to collect food. He never returned.

His cousin, Mazen Shaat, was with him. Mazen said Ahmed was shot in the abdomen when Israeli forces opened fire on a crowd near the United States-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) aid distribution centre in Rafah. Others were also killed and wounded.

In just one month, 600 Palestinians have been killed and more than 4,200 wounded by Israeli fire near GHF aid distribution sites, according to Gaza’s Government Media Office, and the number of deaths at these centres climbs on a near-daily basis. What were meant to be lifelines – facilitated by the US while bypassing United Nations agencies – have instead become fatal chokepoints.

Human rights organisations and UN officials have criticised the GHF model as militarised, dangerous and unlawful. A report published by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz on Friday quoted Israeli army soldiers saying they had been ordered to shoot into unarmed crowds, even when no threat was present.

Advertisement

Asmahan’s grief turned to fury: “Is it reasonable that my son should die because he went to bring us food? Where is the world that calls itself free? How long will this torture go on?”

Gaza’s population of 2 million people, worn out by 21 months of relentless bombing and displacement, has been pushed to the brink of famine by Israel’s restrictions that have, since March 2, allowed only a trickle of humanitarian items through the sealed crossings it controls.

‘We want you, not food’

Inside the morgue at Nasser Hospital, not far from where Ahmed lay, 25-year-old Shireen threw herself on the body of her husband, Khalil al-Khatib, 29. She was barely able to stand as she sobbed.

“Khalil, get up. Your son Ubaida is waiting for you,” she cried. “I told him this morning, ‘Daddy will come back soon.’ We don’t want food – we want you.”

Khalil had also left from al-Mawasi in search of aid. His father-in-law, Youssef al-Rumailat, said Khalil was careful to avoid Israeli tanks and never expected to be targeted.

“He was a gentle man,” Youssef said. “He feared for his safety in a place where everything has become deadly, so he hadn’t been able to provide anything for his children. His son Ubaida, who just turned five, would ask for bread or rice. And he’d cry because he couldn’t provide that or milk for his youngest, born just days into the war.”

“They use our desperation,” Youssef said bitterly. “Nothing is more painful for a man than not being able to provide for his family. These places are now death traps. This is not aid. This is annihilation.”

Youssef said the family, like many others, has lost all trust in the new humanitarian mechanism. “We don’t want this blood-soaked aid. Let us go back to the UN system. At least we weren’t being killed trying to eat.”

Man expresses emotion as he sits next to a body bag
Hundreds of Palestinians have gone to GHF sites to get food only to return to their families dead [Mohamed Solaimane/Al Jazeera]

Hunger, desperation and death

The GHF, launched in May with Israel’s coordination, was intended to deliver food directly to southern Gaza. However, its deliveries are not routed through traditional humanitarian agencies like UNRWA, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, which Israel has accused – without providing conclusive evidence – of ties to Hamas. Critics said this exclusion has contributed to a breakdown in oversight, coordination and safety.

While Israel said it facilitates aid deliveries and targets only perceived threats, testimonies and reports paint a starkly different picture.

Advertisement

Mustafa Nabil Abu Eid, 31, displaced from Rafah to al-Mawasi, was returning from the Rafah distribution point with his friend Abdullah Abu Ghali, 39. They were carrying a few bags of pasta, rice and lentils in their backpacks.

Mustafa described the trip as a “death journey”.

“We walk about 2km [1.2 miles] just to reach the edge of the zone,” he said. “Then we wait – hours sometimes – until tanks move back. When they do, we run across open ground. You don’t know if you’ll get food or be killed.”

He said he’s often asked why people still go.

“There’s no choice. If we stay in the tents, we die from hunger, disease, bombing. If we go, we might die, but we might also bring something back for our kids.”

Mustafa has five children. His eldest, Saba, is 10. His youngest – twins Hoor and Noor – just turned three.

“They cry from hunger. I can’t bear it. We search for life through death.”

Funerals and prayers held at the hospital for the people killed while collecting aid.
A funeral and prayers are held at Nasser Hospital for a Palestinian killed by Israeli forces while collecting aid at a GHF site [Mohamed Solaimane/Al Jazeera]

‘Death trap’ distribution

Aid agencies have warned that famine is already present in parts of Gaza. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) reported in June that the entire population is facing acute food shortages with more than one million people at risk of starvation. Children are dying from malnutrition and dehydration.

With UNRWA’s operations severely restricted and the GHF offering limited, inconsistent and dangerous access to food, desperate civilians have little choice but to risk their lives for basic sustenance.

Since the American-Israeli aid initiative began on May 27, 39 people remain unaccounted for, presumed missing or killed near the aid zones, according to Gaza’s government. Some have likely been buried in unmarked graves or remain trapped under rubble or in inaccessible terrain.

Call for accountability

The systematic attacks on civilians at aid sites may amount to war crimes, according to international legal experts and human rights watchdogs. Under international humanitarian law, parties to a conflict must ensure the protection of civilians and the unhindered delivery of humanitarian aid.

“Deliberate attacks on civilians and civilian objects, including aid workers and distribution points, are strictly prohibited,” the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said in a June statement.

But for families like the Shaats and the Khatibs, legal classifications offer little comfort.

Asmahan clings to one hope – that her son’s name will not be forgotten.

“He just wanted to feed his family,” she said. “He did nothing wrong. They killed him like his life meant nothing. Tell the world: We are not numbers. We are people, and we are starving.”

This piece was published in collaboration with Egab.

 

Read More

British Caribbean News

Virgin Islands News - News.VI

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Virgin Islands News

Parent and Student Rights Meeting Explains Disability Laws Supporting Children in School

Parents and advocates gathered Wednesday evening on St. Thomas for a hybrid disability education training, where speakers urged families to understand their rights and push for individualized support for students with disabilities in Virgin Islands schools.
The session was hosted by the Disability Rights Center of the Virgin Islands along with Beyond Visions Foundation, Family Voices VI, and the VI DD Council.
The Disability Rights Center of the VI was created in 1977 and is the only territory-wide advocacy organization established by Congress that provides legal services to eligible persons with disabilities in the USVI.
“We perform basically the legal service of the disability community,” said Shammi Carr, an advocate for the DRCVI, who also noted that the organization provides lay advocacy, information, training, outreach, and more. “We do all sorts of things, but I think the most important thing for you guys to know is that, when it comes to parent advocacy, we can help you out, one on one. We can help you go to review your IEP. We can go to IEP meetings. We can also assist with reviewing your records.”
IEP refers to an Individual Education Plan. To ensure community members share an understanding of key terms like IEP, DRCVI included the following slide in their PowerPoint presentation.

“There’s nothing worse than being at the table and they’re talking alphabet soup and you have no clue what’s going on,” said Carr, describing the confusion people may feel learning about the long list of acronyms for legal protections, individualized plans, and teaching approaches that shape special education. “That’s a terrible feeling, especially when trying to advocate for someone you love, like a child.”
The training session focused mainly on breaking down the three primary laws that protect students with disabilities: the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 1990), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Each law offers different types of support, eligibility criteria, and documentation requirements.

While outlining where these laws cover students with disabilities, Carr noted that the Trump administration has made repeated attempts to cut funding or roll back protections for programs that support students with disabilities. She said that the uncertainty has left disability rights leaders questioning whether critical laws will continue to be enforced.
“The Rehabilitation Act is enforced by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights. I did check last time, they’re still alive. You know, with everything going on with this administration, we sometimes wonder. When we go on a website and all of a sudden it’s gone, what happened? So last I checked, it was there … but that’s not a given anymore, sadly,” Carr said.

While explaining how students qualify for services under federal disability laws, Carr noted that conditions such as ADHD or sickle cell disease can fall under the category of “other health impairment” in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. IDEA recognizes 13 specific categories of disability, including autism, intellectual disabilities, and multiple disabilities, but also provides for students whose needs do not fit neatly into a single label.
“My child has sickle cell. Okay, well, there’s not one specific for sickle cell, but there’s definitely one called other health impaired. Well, my child has ADHD. I don’t see ADHD on that list, nope. ADHD is going to fall under other health impaired,” Carr explained during the session.
She added that under “other health impaired,” an individual assessment is required to determine whether the condition substantially limits a student’s ability to learn. “You can have a disability and one child is getting services, another child isn’t. That’s because every disability is different, even the ones with the same labels,” Carr said, emphasizing the importance of individualized assessment. “We want to treat each child as an individual. We want to make sure that each child is getting the exact type of service that they need, and they’re not getting overly labeled, but also they’re not getting underly labeled.”
In contrast, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act do not rely on a fixed list of categories. Instead, they define a student with a disability as anyone with a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, such as learning. “There is no list … Basically, you look at the definition and you say, Yep, that’s me,” Carr said.
IDEA covers students from birth through age 22, while 504 and ADA protections extend to all ages and educational settings, including colleges and adult training programs. Carr noted that this broad coverage ensures that students with a wide range of health conditions, from diabetes to epilepsy to mental health challenges, can access the support they need, even after they are done with education.
Carr expressed concern that some schools may be steering students with disabilities into costly credit recovery programs, rather than providing the compensatory education services they are entitled to under federal law. She questioned the motives behind these programs, suggesting that financial incentives could be at play.
“I just find it very opportunistic if you’re going to do credit recovery, especially for children with disabilities. We call it something else. We call it compensatory educational services,” Carr said.
She encouraged parents to reach out for advocacy support as soon as they are offered credit recovery to see if their child instead qualifies for compensatory services under IDEA. “If you have a child who is behind and they’re talking about credit recovery, come see us first. Let’s see if under the IDEA process, compensatory services should be offered in lieu of any kind of credit recovery which has cost, where the compensatory does not have cost,” she said.
A key message from the session was the importance of early intervention and individualized support, with Carr encouraging parents to reach out as soon as they notice their child struggling in school. The DRCVI and its partners, including Beyond Vision Foundation and Family Voices, provide a range of services to help families navigate the complex web of systems and laws designed to support students with special educational needs.
The DRCVI plans to offer additional sessions later this month, focusing in greater detail on 504 and ADA plans. Parents and caregivers interested in learning more were encouraged to contact the organization for resources and information about upcoming events.

Read More